Archive for NaijaPositive.com Dedicated to providing you with POSITIVE news and updates about Nigeria.
 



       NaijaPositive.com Forum Index -> Culture & Tradition
admin

Tribal Markings

Tribal Markings

Here we go again. Why should Tribal Marks be considered slashes?

There are differences between slashes and markings, and the fact that some people may have slashes rather than markings is solely an issue to be discussed between the slasher and the slashee or others equally concerned.

When we continue to present half-truths to others otherwise uninformed, especially in foreign settings, we perpetuate the rumours which end up causing backlashes rather than solutions.

The fact that Mr. or Mrs. A do not like the tribal markings on their body, face or whatever, and that it causes them discomfort, distress or shame should not exclude the fact that maybe Mr. or Mrs. B are proud of their markings for whatever reasons, heritage, culture, tradition, beauty, etc., and equally find that it makes them unique, sexy, distinguishes them or brings them cultural pride.

Another example is piercing, Africans have always pierced their female children's ears, while westerners do it optionally. Does that mean Africans and those Caucasians who choose to pierce their ears or those of their female offspring are barbaric?

Let's move along, and consider piercing of other body parts. Africans and others from various nationalities have been known to do these for centuries, does this mean they are all barbaric? How about the American and European teens of nowadays who dare to pierce body parts once unheard of (nipples, tongues, and others I do not care to mention); are they similarly barbaric or have they simply watched too much PBS (Public Broadcasting Station for those who may not know)? Gone are the days of simply earrings and nose rings, now you have tongue, nipple and butt rings

Circumcision both male and female have also been practiced by various cultures and religions for centuries, and though we note that some people have done it without much care or the continuation of certain types of circumcision may no longer serve meaningful purposes, should we consider every act of circumcision barbaric.

We should not forget that in America which is part of the western world, some serial rapists beg to be castrated, which is an act that goes way beyond markings or circumcision, can we say this is enlightenment and worthy to be emulated?

Tattoos are also worthy of mention. Different cultures worldwide believe in different levels and types of tattoos, some temporary, others permanent, for variety of reasons; religion, tradition, to make statements, for identification and sometimes simply for beauty. Such are tattoos on feet or heads of Moslems, Indians, Hausas, Fulanis, Tuaregs, regardless of what colour ink or designs are chosen, or the types that westerners regardless of whether they are simply law abiding citizens or gang members indulge in on their backs, arms, chests, legs and other body parts.

An African or Indian with Tattoos to beautify themselves such as those used during weddings and other ceremonial activities may be shocked to see the tattoos of snakes and other seemingly weird choices made by some Caucasians, but I'm sure they'll agree that 'to each his own,' as they are not personally affected by those people's choices.

Some of these tattoos are temporary while others permanent can rightfully be called markings, so which do we now consider as barbaric? Some Caucasian women equally tattoo eyebrows, eyelines, liplines, etc., so are these all barbaric?

We are all individuals and have the choice to celebrate ourselves in anyway law abiding way we see fit. If I choose to tattoo my butt and you choose to pierce your private organs; or if I choose to give my children or even myself tribal markings and you choose to circumcise your sons and daughters, this is simply a part of our differences, regardless of our race, citizenship, nationality, culture, religion, language, financial standing, class status or education.

The bottom line is the world has vast cultures, traditions and practices, rightfully so, since everyone is different and may simply choose to differentiate and distinguish themselves further; so while we may not agree with the choices of our numerous fellow beings, we should, when acts of theirs do not in anyway directly affect our well being, respect their choices.

Moreso, in regard to various African practices which to our surprise may not be peculiar to Africans only, we should learn to appreciate and celebrate our differences rather than condemn them.

Cxsm
4/19/05

© Cxsm 2005 All Rights Reserved
__________________
Why worry yourselves about human markings of this world, instead 'Seek to bear the spiritual mark of the Lord Jesus Christ, and vehemently avoid the mark of the beast'. - Cxsm
admin

Quote:
As they say, "It is evil to wish without acting or act without an aim!" - Asogba69


And what is the point of this statement or proverb? Could you please explain its relevance to the above discussion.

Also, since you said 'Gberen' was for medicinal/spiritual purposes, I suppose it doesn't fall into the category of what we're considering as beauty marks or identification marks (those that distinguish a person and identify him/her as being an indigent of a particular State or town).

'Gberens' I suppose are choices made by parents of the child or adults who deem them medicinally/spiritually necessary, and as in the case of female circumcision, wherein those who choose to subject others to them believe they serve as deterrents or protection, these are more worthy of discussions regarding their true and eventual benefits.

Can we thus deduce that while Gberens and female circumcision type markings are based on beliefs, the others (tribal marks, tattoos, etc.) are for cultural and aesthetic reasons?

Are Pele and Buma alternate names for traditional marks, if not please enlighten.

Depending on the type of markings (since some are just markings while some may be closer to slashings as you have stated), I assume each person who has them knows what the pain they had to endure was, as in the cases of body piercings and tattoos also.

While one person may feel they are like constant needle pricks or shaving mishaps, another may feel they are like roofing nails or broken bottles piercing the feet, so only the recipients can say for sure, but the fact is in some cultures, it is desirable to obtain these markings and for those who enjoy the aesthetic rewards, they are willing to and have endured the temporary pain.

Some people would rather have traditional marks than wound scars which sometimes results in keloids especially in darker skinned races. So while traditional marks which usually are markings on the cheeks can cause temporary physical pain and trauma, shame and emotional pain to 'some' people at least they're not comparable to meaningless gashes across one's forehead or other body parts caused by severe injuries or accidents.

Considering some of the recipients are children without much say when it comes to some types of traditional markings, as adults they if they so choose or can afford to, can choose available costmetic options.
Moreover, tattoos and traditional markings are easier to cover up or be removed as in the example cited by another person, whereas scars and keloids need more extensive surgery.

Cxsm
4/19/05
___________________
Eventually we shall leave this mortal body and our souls shall meet our maker.

       NaijaPositive.com Forum Index -> Culture & Tradition
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum